No portal. No platform. Nothing new to learn.
It reads and organizes the file, runs the research, drafts the work, checks every citation, watches every deadline, runs your support calculations, fills your court forms, and tells you how the other side will likely read a draft before it goes out. It lives in the inbox you already use.
You approve everything. You sign everything. A system built for your firm and used by no one else, hosted in Canada, with one disclosed exception stated plainly on the Security page.
What it looks like
An instruction comes back as the exact words the team will act on, with one button. The work arrives on the same thread, every fact carrying its source.
Draft the reply to opposing on the disclosure deadline in Hartwell. Ask for the outstanding bank statements by the 30th.
Here is what I will do, on your say-so: draft a letter to opposing counsel on Hartwell (FN90312) requesting the bank statements still outstanding from the disclosure request of 12 May, with a deadline of the 30th, and send you the draft as a Word document for review. Nothing goes to a client, a court, or the other side except through you.
ConfirmNothing moves without your say-so. Not quite right? Reply. Fresh words, fresh button.
Anything the file cannot support is left off, or flagged. It never guesses.
Illustrative. Names, dates, and documents on this page are invented; the shape is what arrives on your real matter. In use today at a BC family-law and wills practice, on live matters, under lawyer sign-off.
One
Not autocomplete. Not a chatbot. A coordinated team of AI associates that takes a whole matter end to end: reads the file, runs the research, drafts the deliverable, reviews it. It works your 500-document divorce, not a blank text box.
Two
Every citation is independently verified against CanLII before it reaches you. No invented cases. Instructions come back as the exact words, and you confirm with one tap. You approve everything; you sign everything. Built around Law Society of BC guidance, with a written client-consent workflow developed with your firm at onboarding.
Three
Month-to-month. No seat minimums. No annual lock-in. We count lawyers, not seats: your staff are included. A flat monthly price gets you the whole team, and compute, the processing cost of the actual work, is billed at cost, itemized to the file. At the pilot firm, a research memo with sixteen verified citations cost the file $9.25.
Setup
Give your AI legal team read-only access to the matter folder you already keep. That’s it. No migration, no data entry, no new system, nothing to learn.
It reads the file as it actually is: pleadings, disclosure, correspondence, scans, photos of documents, spreadsheets. Anything it cannot read with confidence, it flags for you. It never guesses.
And nothing else changes. Whatever software runs your practice today keeps running it. There is no username and no password: your side of the system is email itself. It is closer to someone new on the team than to new software.
Three things to hand it this week
“Send me the complete chronology of the matter, every entry sourced.”
The whole matter in date order, every entry carrying the exact quote it came from and the page it lives on. And every email from the team carries a button that opens a read-only page showing where the matter stands, no login, only what the file actually supports. The link itself is the key: anyone holding it can open the page.
“Run the support numbers three ways on Hartwell: shared parenting, primary residence with our client, and the schedule opposing proposed.”
Three stamped calculation sheets, every input traced to its source, in the same subscription. Spousal ranges presented as what they are: advisory. The AI never does the math. Regular software computes every number.
“Research whether an independent adult child’s wills-variation claim can succeed where the will explains the unequal division. Facts as in Novak.”
A structured memo on verified CanLII authority, the options and their trade-offs, and what the evidence cannot answer said plainly. Then ask for the first draft. You edit in Word; the team picks up your edits.
Why firms do this
This is not about replacing staff. It is about how much work your firm can say yes to.
Every practice has a ceiling: the matters you can responsibly carry with the people you have, set mostly by how long intake, research, and first drafts take. CaseClarity moves that work from days to hours. More matters through the same firm, with the same people, at the quality you sign your name to.
Honest fit
A good fit today: a BC family-law or wills practice with document-heavy matters, files kept in folders the firm already shares internally, and a lawyer willing to review early output closely. That last part matters: founding firms shape the product, and the lawyer’s scrutiny is part of the deal.
Not yet: other provinces and practice areas (that is where this goes, not where it starts); anyone wanting unsupervised legal advice, automatic filing, or client-facing AI, which this will never be; and consumer self-help, which this is not. If you are outside today’s fit, email anyway and we will be straight with you about timing.
Every other tool is software you operate. CaseClarity is a team you email.
We are working with a small founding group of BC family and wills firms, one firm at a time. Wider availability follows.
There is no contact form. We are a team you email: hello@caseclarity.ai